Ahnlab Vs Kaspersky

The lab at AV-TEST examined 20 Internet security suites. The focus of the test involved the categories of protection, performance and the effect on usability. A total of seven packages received special recognition.

20 security packages

under Windows 10 put to the test.

Kaspersky's 2021 Windows antivirus lineup offers close to complete coverage without slowing down your computer much, although the least expensive program doesn't offer many extra features.

Phishing, drive-by download, sniffing, spoofing: these are but a few of the frequent methods of attack that await unwitting users on the Internet. The malware samples used in these attacks are even more numerous: in January 2018, the statistics at AV-TEST counted 730 million samples. Given this level of threat, anyone who is still running around without protection software can receive quick emergency assistance. The experts at AV-TEST put 20 Internet security suites under Windows 10 to the test. The result in many cases is very encouraging, as the protection is often flawless. However, it is noticeable that some products still put a load on the Windows system or falsely detect clean software.

In this test, the lab was able to award the coveted designation as TOP PRODUCT a total of 7 times.

AhnLab V3 Internet Security. By AhnLab Free to try. Developer's Description. By AhnLab Protects against security threats such as virus, worm, trojan horse, and spyware with the. AhnLab Asia Pacific Website - AhnLab. An industry-leading information security vendor, delivers a comprehensive security lineup including proven, world-class antivirus products, network security appliances, and advanced security services. Use of Kaspersky Internet Security 19 along with incompatible software may cause errors in the applications and the operating system. We recommend that you disable AhnLab Network Filter Driver AMonTDLH.sys for correct installation and functioning of Kaspersky Internet Security 19. AhnLab is a growing cloud-based Antivirus Software software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. AhnLab received a rating of 3.7 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average (2.7/5) when compared to other solutions in their category. The rating of AhnLab is 3.7 stars out of 5.

' tabindex='0'>20 security packages put to the test

In this test, the lab was able to award the coveted designation as TOP PRODUCT a total of 7 times.

More than half the test participants had such high detection rates that they were rewarded with the maximum 6 points.

' tabindex='0'>Detection rates in the test

More than half the test participants had such high detection rates that they were rewarded with the maximum 6 points.

In the test, the package achieved the maximum 18 points and detected all malware threats without exception.

' tabindex='0'>McAfee Internet Security

In the test, the package achieved the maximum 18 points and detected all malware threats without exception.

The reliable protection package demonstrated error-free performance in all test categories, thus achieving 18 points.

' tabindex='0'>

Ahnlab Vs Kaspersky Vs

Kaspersky Internet Security

The reliable protection package demonstrated error-free performance in all test categories, thus achieving 18 points.

Ahnlab

The free security package without lots of extras earned a very good rating of 17 points in the test.

' tabindex='0'>Avast Free AntiVirus

The free security package without lots of extras earned a very good rating of 17 points in the test.

2

Detection rates in the test

4

Kaspersky Internet Security

20 security packages on the test bench

Many well-known names are on the list of the products evaluated: AhnLab, Avast, AVG, Avira, Bitdefender, BullGuard, Comodo, ESET, F-Secure, G Data, K7 Computing, Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, Microsoft, Microworld, Panda Security, PC Pitstop, Symantec, Trend Micro and VIPRE Security. Some of the packages tested can also be used free of charge for private purposes. The products were evaluated in the categories of protection, performance and usability, and were able to achieve the maximum of 6 points in each category.

A total of seven of the protection packages tested received the lab’s TOP PRODUCT designation, as they achieved the maximum score of 18 or 17.5 points. They are from Kaspersky Lab, McAfee and VIPRE Security with 18 points each, along with AhnLab, Avira, Bitdefender and Trend Micro with 17.5 points each. But the following midfield of an additional 7 products also received 16 to 17 points out of a possible 18. The last 5 packages still managed to have good scores of 15.5 to 15 points. This also includes the system protection of Windows with the Defender.

7 protection packages with absolutely error-free detection

The object of the test was to detect and fend off nearly 11,000 Trojans, worms etc. The lab divides the first segment of this test category into the real-world test, requiring detection of brand-new malware only a few hours old. In the second section with the AV-TEST reference set, the task is to fend off malware samples that are already known and a maximum of two weeks old. The comprehensive tests are always performed in duplicate. In this case, in November and December 2017. Thus, four individual results per product are provided in the table. 13 of the 20 products tested received the maximum 6 points for the test category of protection.

The following 7 products detected all threats without exception in both test series: AhnLab, Bitdefender, Comodo, F-Secure, McAfee, Symantec and Trend Micro. The products from Avast, AVG and Panda Security also remained error-free in the real-world test, yet overlooked individual threats in the test involving the reference set in one month, achieving 99.9 and 99.8 percent respectively. The security packages from Avast and Panda Security can be used free of charge by private users.

It is worth noting that for years, Windows Defender always ended up at the bottom of the test table in terms of malware detection. But here’s a surprise: In the meantime, Defender has worked its way up the list with better detection quality. Only in the real-world test, it did not detect all the threats, which is why it is found in midfield of the table.

All other products also had quite good detection scores, with two or even three of the individual scores often reaching 100% detection. But a ranking among top finishers requires all individual scores to reach the 100% mark.

If Windows suddenly becomes slower

The test for the system load quickly shows a decline in performance in everyday use if a security solution is used. For this test, the system load for the following operations was measured on two reference systems: copying files, visiting websites, performing downloads, launching and installing programs. The reference systems consist of one standard and one high-end PC. The overall scores were then averaged for comparison.

The entire procedure was also repeated with each product on two identical systems, and the values were measured. The test shows quite distinct differences in the system load. The best scores were attained by the products from AhnLab, Avira, Bitdefender, Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, Microworld, PC Pitstop and VIPRE Security. For this, they received 6 out of 6 possible points. This list also includes three packages that delivered an absolutely flawless performance in the detection tests. They come from AhnLab, Bitdefender and McAfee.

A slight system load was measured when running the security suites of Avast, AVG, F-Secure, Microsoft and Trend Micro. For a still good result they received 5.5 out of 6 possible points. The solutions from BullGuard, G Data and Symantec achieved only 5 points.

Ahnlab

Ahnlab Vs Kaspersky Internet Security

A noticeably higher system load was generated by the packages from Comodo, K7 Computing, ESET and Panda Security. They received a mere 4.5 to 3.5 points.

False alarms make users uneasy

Pandemonium breaks out when users suddenly receive an alarm from their security solution that they are attempting to use an infected program. The uncertainty grows even greater if the alarm was a false positive and everything is fine afterwards. That is why in its test for usability, the lab tests for products that are prone to cause false positives. To do so, all security packages are installed, and while they are running, 500 websites are visited and over 40 programs are installed and launched. In addition, over 1.3 million innocuous programs are copied onto the computers that the system is then required to scan. In this segment as well, the testers again rewarded the maximum of 6 points.

Given the high number of programs tested, many false alarms are really ought to be expected. The fact that this does not have to be the case was demonstrated by the products from Avira, K7 Computing, Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, Microworld, Panda Security, Trend Micro and VIPRE Security. They had between 0 and 3 false positives in the entire test, receiving 6 points for this result. Avira and Kaspersky were the only packages without a single false positive.

An additional 9 security solutions had 4 to 7 false positives and for this they still received good scores of 5.5 to 5 points. The products from Microsoft and PC Pitstop were somewhat more conspicuous: they each falsely detected 25 and 28 programs respectively, sounding an alarm. For this, only 4 points were awarded.

TOP PRODUCT rating awarded 7 times in the final result

If a product receives 18 or 17.5 points as an overall rest result, it receives the lab’s accolade as a TOP PRODUCT. A total of 7 products achieved this coveted designation in the test. Three of them staged a brilliant finish with 18 points: Kaspersky Lab, McAfee and VIPRE Security. The packages from AhnLab, Avira, Bitdefender and Trend Micro ended up with 17.5 points.

The large midfield with 7 products achieved 17 and 16 points respectively in the test. Included are some solutions that earned the maximum point score of 6 in the category of protection. The best free package with an excellent result of 17 points comes from Avast.

Users become unwitting crypto miners

Many cyber criminals have discovered a new source of income: with the help of infected files, browser extensions or JavaScripts, they hijack user PCs and have them mine for digital currencies.

Bitcoin or Ethereum are only two known names of the roughly 1,000 cryptocurrencies currently available. But all digital currencies have one thing in common: the blocks necessary for a blockchain are normally calculated with the help of PCs. For newly-calculated blocks, there is a reward in the form of the relevant cryptocurrency. Thus, anyone who can quickly calculate new blocks with lots of computing power can make large earnings.

On the Internet, there are some providers that offer visitors a deal: instead of having to view advertising, the user of the web services calculates digital currencies during the time of the visit. These mostly honestly-intended deals, however, are the exception. More frequently, websites or links in emails try to install JavaScripts or browser extensions on the user's PC. These utilities then calculate the valuable blocks for the blockchain on behalf of the attacker. The CPU or GPU power is delivered involuntarily and, to top it off, the unwitting PC user also pays what can be considerable power consumption incurred.

A market worth many billions of dollars

The new market offers a vast amount of money in digital currency. This can also be converted into hard currency, however. That is why attackers are always stepping up their efforts to acquire new helpers for their computing infantry. Recently, the AV-TEST lab discovered several browser extensions for Firefox in the Mozilla store that secretly mine for Bitcoins in the background. In the meantime, Mozilla has reacted and removed the extensions. Many manufacturers of security software are familiar with these types of attacks and successfully block them. Certain outgoing links to websites are also known and are intercepted. Only with good security software are users completely safe from these new attacks.

Test reports from November/December 2017
home users under Windows 10

All results ›

LOS ANGELES, United States: Considering the increasing demand of global market, QY Research as of late produced a research report titled, “Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Report, History and Forecast 2015-2026, Breakdown Data by Companies, Key Regions, Types and Application“. The research report speak about the potential development openings that exist in the worldwide market. The report is broken down on the basis of research procedures procured from historical and forecast information. The global Computer Security for Consumer market is relied upon to develop generously and flourish as far as volume and incentive during the gauge time frame. The report will give a knowledge about the development openings and controls that will build the market. Pursuers can increase important perception about the eventual fate of the market.

Key Companies/Manufacturers operating in the global Computer Security for Consumer market include:
NortonLifeLock, Fortinet, McAfee, Avast, Trend Micro, Bitdefender, ESET, Kaspersky Lab, Comodo, F-Secure, AHNLAB

Get PDF Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) :

Ahnlab Vs Kaspersky Antivirus

Segmental Analysis

The report incorporates significant sections, for example, type and end user and a variety of segments that decide the prospects of global Computer Security for Consumer market. Each type provide data with respect to the business esteem during the conjecture time frame. The application area likewise gives information by volume and consumption during the estimate time frame. The comprehension of this segment direct the readers in perceiving the significance of variables that shape the market development.

Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Segment By Type:

Network Security
Identity Theft
Endpoint Security
Antivirus Software
Others

Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Segment By Application:

Below 20 Years Old
20-50 Years Old
Above 50 Years Old Global Computer Security for Consumer market: regional analysis, the major regions covered in the report are:
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Nordic
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of Middle East & Africa The report lists the major players in the regions and their respective market share on the basis of global revenue. It also explains their strategic moves in the past few years, investments in product innovation, and changes in leadership to stay ahead in the competition. This will give the reader an edge over others as a well-informed decision can be made looking at the holistic picture of the market. The Computer Security for Consumer key players in this market include:
NortonLifeLock
Fortinet
McAfee
Avast
Trend Micro
Bitdefender
ESET
Kaspersky Lab
Comodo
F-Secure
AHNLAB

Competitive Landscape

Competitor analysis is one of the best sections of the report that compares the progress of leading players based on crucial parameters, including market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, price, and production. From the nature of competition to future changes in the vendor landscape, the report provides in-depth analysis of the competition in the global Computer Security for Consumer market.

Ahnlab Vs Kaspersky Vpn

Key questions answered in the report:

  • What is the growth potential of the Computer Security for Consumer market?
  • Which product segment will grab a lion’s share?
  • Which regional market will emerge as a frontrunner in the coming years?
  • Which application segment will grow at a robust rate?
  • What are the growth opportunities that may emerge in the Computer Security for Consumer industry in the years to come?
  • What are the key challenges that the global Computer Security for Consumer market may face in the future?
  • Which are the leading companies in the global Computer Security for Consumer market?
  • Which are the key trends positively impacting the market growth?
  • Which are the growth strategies considered by the players to sustain hold in the global Computer Security for Consumer market

For Discount, Customization in the Report Drop Your Query Here:
https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1979765/global-computer-security-for-consumer-market

TOC

1 Market Overview of Computer Security for Consumer
1.1 Computer Security for Consumer Market Overview
1.1.1 Computer Security for Consumer Product Scope
1.1.2 Market Status and Outlook
1.2 Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Size Overview by Region 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026
1.3 Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Region (2015-2026)
1.4 Global Computer Security for Consumer Historic Market Size by Region (2015-2020)
1.5 Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Size Forecast by Region (2021-2026)
1.6 Key Regions, Computer Security for Consumer Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)
1.6.1 North America Computer Security for Consumer Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)
1.6.2 Europe Computer Security for Consumer Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)
1.6.3 Asia-Pacific Computer Security for Consumer Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)
1.6.4 Latin America Computer Security for Consumer Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)
1.6.5 Middle East & Africa Computer Security for Consumer Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 2 Computer Security for Consumer Market Overview by Type
2.1 Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Type: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026
2.2 Global Computer Security for Consumer Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020)
2.3 Global Computer Security for Consumer Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026)
2.4 Network Security
2.5 Identity Theft
2.6 Endpoint Security
2.7 Antivirus Software
2.8 Others 3 Computer Security for Consumer Market Overview by Application
3.1 Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Application: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026
3.2 Global Computer Security for Consumer Historic Market Size by Application (2015-2020)
3.3 Global Computer Security for Consumer Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026)
3.4 Below 20 Years Old
3.5 20-50 Years Old
3.6 Above 50 Years Old 4 Global Computer Security for Consumer Competition Analysis by Players
4.1 Global Computer Security for Consumer Market Size (Million US$) by Players (2015-2020)
4.2 Global Top Manufacturers by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) (based on the Revenue in Computer Security for Consumer as of 2019)
4.3 Date of Key Manufacturers Enter into Computer Security for Consumer Market
4.4 Global Top Players Computer Security for Consumer Headquarters and Area Served
4.5 Key Players Computer Security for Consumer Product Solution and Service
4.6 Competitive Status
4.6.1 Computer Security for Consumer Market Concentration Rate
4.6.2 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 5 Company (Top Players) Profiles and Key Data
5.1 NortonLifeLock
5.1.1 NortonLifeLock Profile
5.1.2 NortonLifeLock Main Business
5.1.3 NortonLifeLock Products, Services and Solutions
5.1.4 NortonLifeLock Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.1.5 NortonLifeLock Recent Developments
5.2 Fortinet
5.2.1 Fortinet Profile
5.2.2 Fortinet Main Business and Company’s Total Revenue
5.2.3 Fortinet Products, Services and Solutions
5.2.4 Fortinet Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020)
5.2.5 Fortinet Recent Development and Reaction to Covid-19
5.3 McAfee
5.5.1 McAfee Profile
5.3.2 McAfee Main Business
5.3.3 McAfee Products, Services and Solutions
5.3.4 McAfee Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.3.5 Avast Recent Developments
5.4 Avast
5.4.1 Avast Profile
5.4.2 Avast Main Business
5.4.3 Avast Products, Services and Solutions
5.4.4 Avast Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.4.5 Avast Recent Developments
5.5 Trend Micro
5.5.1 Trend Micro Profile
5.5.2 Trend Micro Main Business
5.5.3 Trend Micro Products, Services and Solutions
5.5.4 Trend Micro Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.5.5 Trend Micro Recent Developments
5.6 Bitdefender
5.6.1 Bitdefender Profile
5.6.2 Bitdefender Main Business
5.6.3 Bitdefender Products, Services and Solutions
5.6.4 Bitdefender Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.6.5 Bitdefender Recent Developments
5.7 ESET
5.7.1 ESET Profile
5.7.2 ESET Main Business and Company’s Total Revenue
5.7.3 ESET Products, Services and Solutions
5.7.4 ESET Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020)
5.7.5 ESET Recent Development and Reaction to Covid-19
5.8 Kaspersky Lab
5.8.1 Kaspersky Lab Profile
5.8.2 Kaspersky Lab Main Business
5.8.3 Kaspersky Lab Products, Services and Solutions
5.8.4 Kaspersky Lab Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.8.5 Kaspersky Lab Recent Developments
5.9 Comodo
5.9.1 Comodo Profile
5.9.2 Comodo Main Business
5.9.3 Comodo Products, Services and Solutions
5.9.4 Comodo Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.9.5 Comodo Recent Developments
5.10 F-Secure
5.10.1 F-Secure Profile
5.10.2 F-Secure Main Business
5.10.3 F-Secure Products, Services and Solutions
5.10.4 F-Secure Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.10.5 F-Secure Recent Developments
5.11 AHNLAB
5.11.1 AHNLAB Profile
5.11.2 AHNLAB Main Business
5.11.3 AHNLAB Products, Services and Solutions
5.11.4 AHNLAB Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020)
5.11.5 AHNLAB Recent Developments 6 North America
6.1 North America Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Country
6.2 United States
6.3 Canada 7 Europe
7.1 Europe Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Country
7.2 Germany
7.3 France
7.4 U.K.
7.5 Italy
7.6 Russia
7.7 Nordic
7.8 Rest of Europe 8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Region
8.2 China
8.3 Japan
8.4 South Korea
8.5 Southeast Asia
8.6 India
8.7 Australia
8.8 Rest of Asia-Pacific 9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Country
9.2 Mexico
9.3 Brazil
9.4 Rest of Latin America 10 Middle East & Africa
10.1 Middle East & Africa Computer Security for Consumer Market Size by Country
10.2 Turkey
10.3 Saudi Arabia
10.4 UAE
10.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa 11 Computer Security for Consumer Market Dynamics
11.1 Industry Trends
11.2 Market Drivers
11.3 Market Challenges
11.4 Market Restraints 12 Research Finding /Conclusion 13 Methodology and Data Source 13.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.1 Research Programs/Design
13.1.2 Market Size Estimation
13.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
13.2 Data Source
13.2.1 Secondary Sources
13.2.2 Primary Sources
13.3 Disclaimer
13.4 Author List

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become the brand of quality assurance in consulting industry.